Pathology is arguably one of the oldest specialties in medicine. Today, thanks to technological advances, it is facing a very modern challenge: “pathologists are now in the awkward situation of being asked to do something that humans aren’t capable of,” says David Rimm, MD, PhD, Professor of Pathology and Medicine at Yale School of Medicine. The problem he is describing is that of the increasing demand for pathologists to be able to distinguish between fleetingly small differences in signal levels using nothing but their powers of observation and eyesight.
To understand the challenge, consider the way pathologists measure HER2 – an oncogenic protein – in breast cancer patients. Current companion diagnostic technologies were developed to identify patients with high levels of HER2, as the first generation of antibody drugs worked best in these patients. However, a new generation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has shown significant success with patients expressing lower levels of HER2. The question is now, how low can the levels go before the drugs cease to work?
Differentiating between low levels and very low levels of HER2 is like “weighing mice on a scale made to weigh elephants. The dynamic range is wrong,” says Dr. Rimm. As a result, it is very challenging for pathologists to know which patients are most likely to benefit from the new ADCs – and “I think it's as likely that you'll be able to train pathologists to differentiate these levels as you'll be able to train them to fly when they jump out a window.”